Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 13042

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : UC22 - UC26 Full Version

Evaluation of Gastric Contents and Volume After Ingestion of Apple Juice versus Pure Complex Carbohydrate Using Gastric Ultrasonography: A Randomised Clinical Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64023.18595
Ashritha Kumary Shetty, Aabidhussain Jangi, Madhuri S Kurdi, L Yashaswini

1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, S.N. Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli-Dharwad (Hubli), Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, CDSIMER, Devarkaggala Halli, Kanakpura, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
L Yashaswini,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, CDSIMER, Devarkaggala Halli, Kanakpura, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: l.yashaswini.anwitha.dr@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric ultrasound is a non-invasive tool for assessing gastric content and volume. Aspiration of gastric contents is a serious perioperative complication that contributes to mortality and morbidity following general anaesthesia. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and Indian Society of Anaesthesiology (ISA) fasting guidelines recommend consuming a carbohydrate drink two hours before surgery in adults. However, evidence supporting this recommendation, particularly regarding volume, is still limited and variable.

Aim: To examine Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) using Ultrasonography (USG) six hours after a light breakfast and compare it with GRV two hours after consuming clear liquids.

Materials and Methods: A randomised clinical study was conducted involving 100 patients who were assigned randomly to two groups: Group-C (Oral Carbohydrate, CHO) and Group-A (Apple juice), with 50 patients in each group; each patient underwent gastric USG twice: once within the first six hours after a light breakfast and again two hours after consuming 400 mL of clear liquid. USG was performed with the patient in a supine position and a Right Lateral Decubitus (RLD) position, and GRV was estimated by measuring the Antral Cross-sectional Area (ACSA) using a mathematical model. The final reading was taken from the RLD position, and qualitative analysis of the antrum was conducted using the Perlas grading system. A GRV of <1.5 mL/kg is considered low risk for aspiration. Statistical tests such as Chi-square, paired t-test, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were applied.

Results: A total of 100 patients were analysed in the present study. The mean age was 41.04 years and 39.94 years in Group-A and Group-C, respectively. There was no significant difference in GRV between six hours after a light breakfast and two hours after clear liquid intake in either group (p>0.05). The mean GRV was 7.75 (7.23) mL and 8.01 (7.58) mL six hours after a light breakfast, and 7.71 (8.92) mL and 8.49 (9.47) mL two hours after clear liquid intake in Group-A and Group-C, respectively, among non-CKD patients. GRV was higher in CKD patients and those with an increased Body Mass Index (BMI).

Conclusion: The GRV remains within safe limits after consuming 400 mL of clear liquid two hours before surgery. This finding supports the recommended volume of preoperative clear liquid intake in the ERAS protocol and ISA fasting guidelines. However, careful consideration is necessary for patients with CKD and an increased BMI.

Keywords

Antral cross-sectional area, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Fasting, Residual volume

The concept of pre-loading with oral Carbohydrate (CHO) two hours before surgery has recently been introduced in the ERAS protocol. Giving oral CHO as a preload has been shown to improve the patient well-being, prevent dehydration before surgery, and enable the patient to be in a metabolically fed state prior to surgery. This can have a beneficial effect in reducing insulin resistance and catabolism, thereby improving the quality of recovery (1). Proponents of the ERAS protocol for elective surgeries have stated that preloading with carbohydrates two hours prior to surgery is safe and does not increase the risk of aspiration, but the evidence for this is still limited (2). A recent study based on USG showed that fasting for more than 6-8 hours does not guarantee an empty stomach (3). Aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs is a serious perioperative complication, accounting for nearly 9% of anaesthesia-related deaths (4). The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) and the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists (ISA) recommend a minimum fasting duration of two hours for clear fluids, six hours for a light meal, and eight hours for a fatty meal in healthy adults who do not have conditions that delay gastric emptying or increase gastric volume (2),(5).

Gastric USG guidance has gained widespread acceptance due to its practicality, affordability, and effectiveness as an imaging technique. Recent research utilising bedside gastric ultrasound has provided insights into the composition (liquid, solid, or empty) and volume of stomach contents (6),(7),(8). The novelty of this study lies in the comparison between CHO drink and apple juice, which have different caloric content, and are independent factors affecting gastric emptying. Additionally, the first ultrasound scan was conducted after six hours of fasting, which differs from previous studies that conducted scans overnight (9).

With this background knowledge, an observational study was conducted to examine gastric contents and volume using USG after at least six hours of fasting, and to compare it with gastric volume two hours after ingesting clear liquids (apple juice and pure complex carbohydrate). This study aimed to determine if oral intake of clear liquids two hours before surgery would be safe in terms of the risk of aspiration. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of factors such as age, anxiety, BMI, and the presence of co-morbidities like Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on gastric emptying, content, and volume using gastric USG.

Material and Methods

The randomised clinical trial was conducted on 100 patients over a period of one year, from January 2019 to January 2020, at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (312/2018-19), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Inclusion criteria: Patients between the ages of 19 years and 65 years, classified as ASA grade I and II, of any gender, scheduled for elective surgeries were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Obese individuals (BMI >30 kg/m2), pregnant women, patients with abnormal upper gastrointestinal anatomy (previous oesophageal or gastric surgery/hiatus hernia), those with active gastric or duodenal ulcers, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. CKD was diagnosed based on patient history and a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/hr.

Sample size calculation: Based on previous literature (9), the mean Residual Gastric Volume (RGV) eight hours after Nil Per Oral (NPO) was 13.56 mL (13.25 mL), and two hours after ingesting oral CHO, it was 16.32 mL (11.78 mL), with a mean standard deviation of 5.77 mL. Assuming a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9 between the two measurements and aiming to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two is zero with a power of 0.9 and a Type-I error probability of 0.05, a minimum of 46 subjects in each group was required. Therefore, the total sample size was calculated to be 92, rounded upto 100.

Procedure

The patients were randomly assigned to two groups using computer-generated numbers. The patient and anesthesiologist were aware of the patient’s group allocation, but the radiologist remained blinded.

The two groups were as follows:

• Group 1 (CHO group, Group-C),
• Group 2 (apple juice group, Group-A) (Table/Fig 1).

Group-C: Carbohydrate drink (300 mL) containing the following contents (50 gm providing 200 kcal, with a total carbohydrate content of 50 gm and 6 gm of sugar)+100 mL water.

Group-A: Apple juice (300 mL)+100 mL water.

Patients were instructed to fast for six hours. Each patient underwent abdominal ultrasound twice for quantitative and qualitative analysis of gastric contents.

The first ultrasound was performed and data were recorded after six hours of fasting following a light breakfast. Immediately after the ultrasound evaluation, the patients drank 400 mL of either apple juice or oral CHO solution, based on their group allocation. The drink was supervised by a research student anaesthesiologist. A second ultrasound was conducted two hours after consuming the solution. Prior to the ultrasound, each patient’s anxiety level was assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) questionnaire, which utilises a five-point Likert Scale (1-never; 2-low; 3-moderate; 4-strong; 5-extreme). A cut-off value of >13 was considered significant for preoperative anxiety (10).

The ultrasound assessment of gastric contents was performed by a qualified radiologist using a Philips IU 22 or Philips HD 15 portable ultrasound machine (11). A convex probe (2-7.5MHz) was used, and patients were initially examined in the supine position, followed by the RLD position. A sagittal plane scan of the epigastrium was conducted, with the transducer moving from the left to the right subcostal margins. The gastric antrum was identified just below the left lobe of the liver and pancreas, with the aorta/superior mesenteric artery acting as important landmarks (Table/Fig 2).

Based on qualitative analysis of the antrum, patients were classified as follows:

Grade-0: Empty antrum in both supine and RLD positions, indicating an empty stomach.

Grade-1: Presence of liquid observed only in RLD position, suggesting a small amount of fluid in the stomach.

Grade-2: Presence of liquid content in both supine and RLD positions, indicating increased gastric volume (8).

For quantitative analysis, the ACSA was measured using the technique originally described by Bolondi L et al., (11) and subsequently by Perlas A et al., utilising the outer wall of the stomach (12). ACSA was measured in RLD using two perpendicular diameters: Antero-Posterior (AP) and Craniocaudal (CC).

ACSA={(CC×AP)×p]/4.

Using a p-value of 3.14.

After calculating ACSA, the estimated total volume of the stomach (referred to as “expected volume”) was determined for each subject using a mathematical model (12). The stomach volume (in mL) was calculated as follows: Stomach volume=27+14.6×ACSA (in cm2)-1.28×age (in years).

By calculating the expected volume, the relationship between volume and weight (vol/wt) of the patients was obtained. In adults, if the volume is <100 mL or <1.5 mL/kg, it is generally assumed that the patient is at a low risk of aspiration (7).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using the SPSS for Windows statistical package (version 20, IBM, USA). Chi-square test, t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and paired t-test were used for data analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 106 patients were initially enrolled in the study, but 6 patients dropped out. The demographic profile and anxiety scores were comparable between the two groups, as shown in (Table/Fig 3).

(Table/Fig 4) compares the ACSA and GRV between the two groups. In the apple group, statistical analysis indicated a significant difference in ACSA (2.23 cm2±0.93 versus 2.40 cm2±1.33) and GRV (9.35 mL±9.08 versus 11.71 mL±15.23) between the two time points (after six hours of fasting and two hours after liquid intake). Similarly, in the CHO group, statistical analysis indicated a significant difference in ACSA (2.20 cm2±0.89 versus 2.40 cm2±1.38) and GRV (9.41 mL±9.11 versus 12.22 mL±15.77) between the two time points.

In non-CKD patients, the mean GRV in Group-A after six hours of fasting was 7.7±7.23 mL, and after 2 hours of fluid intake, it was 7.71±8.92 mL, which was not significant (p-value=0.924). In Group-C, the mean GRV after six hours of fasting was 8.01±7.58 mL, and after 2 hours of fluid intake, it was 8.49±9.47 mL, which was also not significant (p-value=0.3). However, there was a significant increase in GRV in CKD patients, as shown in (Table/Fig 5).

There was an increase in Perlas grading after clear liquid intake. In Group-A, 4% of patients moved from Grade-0 to Grade-1 after two hours of fluid intake, and in Group-C, 12% of patients moved from Grade-0 to Grade-1 after two hours of fluid intake (Table/Fig 6).

(Table/Fig 7) shows the association of age with gastric volume, indicating a decrease in gastric volume as age increases.

The association of anxiety and GRV is shown in (Table/Fig 8), demonstrating a significant difference in the change in GRV after fluid intake between patients who are more anxious and less anxious.

(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10) show the association of BMI with gastric volume, indicating an increase in GRV as BMI increases.

Discussion

Aspiration of gastric contents is a dreaded perioperative complication that contributes to mortality and morbidity after general anaesthesia. Mendelson CL described aspiration in obstetrics patients 70 years ago in one of the most widely cited articles in medical literature. This study helped in the empirical formation of the ‘nothing Per Orally’ (NPO) strategy, which recommends fasting for longer than 8-12 hours and has become a standard practice in the name of safety (13). Studies have shown that prolonged fasting is associated with reduced gastric pH and an increase in gastric volume, placing patients at a higher risk of aspiration (9),(14),(15),(16). Current guidelines recommended by the International Society of Anaesthesia (ISA) state that clear liquids can be allowed up to two hours prior to the administration of sedation or anaesthesia. The recommended volume of clear liquid may be restricted to <450 mL, although evidence for this is weak (2).

Clear liquid is defined as any fluid that can be easily digested and cleared from the stomach within two hours (2). In this study, two clear liquids with different caloric contents were chosen, namely apple juice and a clear complex carbohydrate drink. The carbohydrate drink is an ERAS drink, as recommended in the ERAS protocol. The advantage of this drink is that it allows the patient to be in a metabolically fed state before surgery, which has beneficial effects on reducing insulin resistance and catabolism (1). A volume of 400 mL of clear liquid was chosen, following the ERAS protocol (17).

Various methods can be used to estimate GRV, such as radio-labeled diets, polyethylene glycol, paracetamol absorption, electrical impedance tomography aspiration by an enteral tube positioned in the stomach, scintigraphy, USG, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (3),(9).

Gastric USG is a non-invasive, bedside assessment of GRV. In this study, USG was performed by an expert radiologist. Gastric ultrasound can be done with the patient in a supine and RLD position (18). The RLD position was chosen as a larger proportion of the stomach’s content flows towards the more dependent distal antrum in this position, increasing the test’s sensitivity (7). The gastric antrum, the most distal portion of the organ, was chosen for GRV calculation as it is consistently and superficially located in the epigastric region and is amenable to ultrasound examination (7). Several mathematical formulas have been used to estimate GRV using ultrasound, with the Perla and Bouvet models being reliable and applicable (6). Given that the current study was conducted in the RLD position, the Perlas mathematical method was deemed appropriate for calculating stomach volume in this position.

The demographic profile of the current study was comparable to other similar studies and did not show any statistical significance regarding age, gender, height, weight, and BMI (p-value >0.05) (3). When patients were subdivided into CKD and non-CKD groups, non-CKD patients showed no difference in GRV after fasting for six hours compared to two hours after intake of clear liquids. Additionally, no patient in the present study had a critical residual volume (The critical volume of aspiration is defined as a volume of clear fluid in excess of 1.5 mL/kg) (7). A study conducted by Gomes PC et al., in 20 healthy volunteers found no difference in stomach volumes after eight hours of fasting and those obtained at 120 and 180 minutes following intake of either 200 or 400 mL of CHO (carbohydrate) or CHO+GLN (glutamine) (9). Similarly, Bisinotto FM et al., reported no variations in the findings of quantitative evaluation, antral area, stomach volume, and volume/weight ratio at all three measurement intervals in 80 volunteers who underwent gastric ultrasound after an eight-hour fast (8). Comparable results were noted by Patil MC et al., in a study of 60 ASA I patients scheduled for elective surgery and fasted overnight. The study concluded that allowing 200 mL of clear liquids two hours prior to surgery resulted in lesser residual gastric volume (18).

Patients suffering from CKD have significantly delayed gastric emptying due to uraemia, which can lead to significant gastric volume despite fasting. This puts them at a higher risk of aspiration during anaesthesia (3). In the study, there were nine CKD patients, all of whom showed a significant increase in gastric volume, although the volume was not significant enough to indicate aspiration.

The two study drinks had different caloric contents: apple juice with 148 kcal and oral CHO (carbohydrate) with 200 kcal. According to Okabe T et al., the caloric content of a drink, rather than its composition, determines gastric emptying. They compared equal volumes of non-human milk and pulp-free orange juice diluted with either gum syrup or water to match the calorie count and found no significant difference in gastric emptying time after consuming an equal number of calories. They also discovered that ingestion beverages that do not exceed 220 kcal were adequately cleared in less than two hours (19). This finding aligns well with the present study, as the caloric content of our drinks was less than 220 kcal.

In the study conducted by Bisinotto FM et al., eighty volunteers underwent gastric ultrasound three times after an eight-hour fast. They observed an increase in Perlas grading after fluid intake, which is comparable to our study (8).

While other researchers have reported that gastric emptying slows down and GRV increases as patients age (20), the present study found that as age increases, GRV decreases in both groups, with a statistically significant difference in the apple juice group. This discrepancy may be due to the use of the Perlas formula for calculating GRV, which includes age as a negative factor, and the unequal subdivision of age groups, which may act as a confounding factor.

According to a study by Hong JY and Oh JI on the effect of preoperative anxiety on gastric fluid acidity and volume, there were no differences in preoperative gastric pH and volume between highly anxious and low-anxious patients (21). However, in the present study, as the APAIS score for anxiety increased, there was an increase in GRV. Factors such as CKD and BMI may have acted as confounding factors in this relationship.

An increase in GRV was observed in patients with higher BMI, which is consistent with the findings of Sharma G et al., In their study of 100 patients scheduled for elective surgery, gastric ultrasound showed that as a patient’s BMI increases, GRV also increases (3).

Limitation(s)

The fasting status of the patients in this study was based solely on their medical history.

Conclusion

Gastric ultrasound is a simple and non-invasive method used to assess the content and volume of the stomach. It proves to be an effective tool for evaluating the risk of aspiration, especially during anaesthesia. The intake of 400 mL of clear liquid two hours before undergoing anaesthesia is considered safe, but careful consideration is needed for individuals with CKD or elevated BMI. However, to ensure a more accurate assessment in CKD patients, a larger sample size is essential.

References

1.
Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ. Oral carbohydrate preload drink for major surgery-the first steps from famine to feast. (Editorial) Anaesthesia. 2014;69(12):1308-13. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Dongare PA, Bhaskar SB, Harsoor SS, Garg R, Kannan S, Goneppanavar U, et al. Perioperative fasting and feeding in adults, obstetric, paediatric and bariatric population: Practice Guidelines from the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020;64(7):556-584. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sharma G, Jacob R, Mahankali S, Ravindra MN. Preoperative assessment of gastric contents and volume using bedside ultrasound in adult patients: A prospective, observational, correlation study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;62(10):753-58. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Umesh G, Tejesh CA. Probing the future-can gastric ultrasound herald a change in perioperative fasting guidelines? (Editorial). Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;62(10):735-37. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: An updated report by the ASA task force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):376-93. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kaydu A, Gokcek E. Preoperative assessment of ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for gastric content. Medical science monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2018;24:5542-5548. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014;113(1):12-22. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bisinotto FM, de Araújo Naves A, de Lima HM, Peixoto AC, Maia GC, Junior PP, et al. Use of ultrasound for gastric volume evaluation after ingestion of different volumes of isotonic solution. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2017;67(4):376-82. [crossref]
9.
Gomes PC, Caporossi C, Aguilar-Nascimento Je, Silva Am, Araujo Vm. Residual gastric volume evaluation with ultrasonography after ingestion of carbohydrate- or carbohydrate plus glutamine-enriched beverages: A randomized, crossover clinical trial with healthy volunteers. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2017;54(1):33-36. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Jiwanmall M, Jiwanmall SA, Williams A, Kamakshi S, Sugirtharaj L, Poornima K, et al. Preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing day care surgery: Prevalence and associated factors. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2020;42(1):87-92. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bolondi L, Bortolotti M, Santi V, Calletti T, Gaiani S, Labò G. Measurement of gastric emptying time by real-time ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1985;89(4):752-59. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by Gastroscopic Examination. Anesthesia & amp; Analgesia. 2013;116(2):357-63. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Mendelson CL. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1946;7(6):694-95. [crossref]
14.
Rajkumar D, Mehta D. A comparative study of volume and pH of gastric fluid after ingestion of water and sugar-containing clear fluid in children. Indian J Anaesth. 2007;51(2):117-20.
15.
Schmitz A, Kellenberger C, Lochbuehler N, Fruehauf M, Klaghofer R, Fruehauf H, et al. Effect of different quantities of a sugared clear fluid on gastric emptying and residual volume in children: A crossover study using magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(4):644-47. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Hussain R, Nazeer T, Aziz N, Ali M. Effects of fasting intervals on gastric volume and pH. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2011;5(3):582-86.
17.
Pe? dziwiatr M, Mavrikis J, Witowski J, Adamos A, Major P, Nowakowski M, et al. Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery. Medical Oncology. 2018;35(6):95. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Patil MC, Dhulkhed PV, Prajwal B. Ultrasonographic estimation of gastric volume in patients after overnight fasting and after ingestion of clear fluids two hours before surgery. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care. 2020;24(3):308-13. [crossref]
19.
Okabe T, Terashima H, Sakamoto A. Determinants of liquid gastric emptying: Comparisons between milk and isocalorically adjusted clear fluids. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015;114(1):77-82. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Soenen S, Rayner CK, Horowitz M, Jones KL. Gastric emptying in the elderly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2015;31(3):339-53. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Hong JY, Oh JI. Effects of preoperative anxiety on gastric fluid acidity and volume. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2005;20(2):232-35.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64023.18595

Date of Submission: Mar 11, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 21, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 08, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 11, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com